America’s deal with Mexico will make NAFTA worse
Its costly new regulations result from flawed economic logic
TRADE disputes have scarred the presidency of Donald Trump. So markets rose in relief when America and Mexico announced on August 27th that they had agreed on changes to the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). Mr Trump had earlier threatened to walk away from the deal, which eliminated most tariffs between its signatories after coming into force in 1994. As The Economist went to press, it was not clear whether Canada, the third party to NAFTA, would join the deal (see article). But across one border, at least, the threat of a trade crisis looks a bit less likely.
The relief may be short-lived. The concessions that Mexico has granted Mr Trump are for the most part economically damaging. The deal looks good for America only through the distorting prism of the president’s mercantilism. And Mr Trump is pursuing his trade agenda with a reckless bellicosity that makes a chaotic outcome more likely.
This article appeared in the Leaders section of the print edition under the headline “Going south”
More from Leaders
South Africa stands on the brink of salvation—or catastrophe
To prevent a coalition of chaos, Cyril Ramaphosa and the Democratic Alliance must do a deal
The disgrace of a former American president
But this prosecution of Donald Trump was wrongheaded and counter-productive
Japan and South Korea are getting friendlier. At last
As the world economy fragments, two export powerhouses see the virtue of chumminess